A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, overt propaganda, poor or no sourcing to credible information and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the notes section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
The Unz Review
*Voting Polls do not affect MBFC bias ratings
Bias: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Hate Group
Notes: Launched in 2013, The Unz Review is a political analysis website that defines itself as an ‘alternative’ to the ‘mainstream media.’ According to Ron Unz, who is the Editor-in-Chief and the owner of the site their mission is: “I would always prefer reading something disturbing than something dull.”
The Unz Review has a long list of columnist and bloggers, although we couldn’t go through all of the list, some known names are Pat Buchanan, Steve Sailer, Ilana Mercer, and Ron Paul. Steve Sailer has been criticized as both a racist and Islamophobe. He is also listed as a promoter of hate by utilizing primitive stereotypes to describe people of color. Ilana Mercer is also listed as a promoter of hate toward Muslims, according the Southern Poverty Law Center. Further, Ron Unz has donated money to known hate groups and anti-Semite organizations.
In review, The Unz Review publishes articles with loaded words such as “Trump’s Strategy Working—He’s Maneuvered Democrats, RINOS, Into Favoring Foreigners Over Americans.“ On this particular article they utilize questionable sources such as vdare.com, which is classified as an extremist White Nationalist group. They also use a different approach in which they utilize minimally loaded emotional language in their headlines such as “’Shithole Countries’: What Makes a Country? the Place or the People?” However, in the body of the article one can find plenty of racism and hate under the disguise of a philosophical discussion. Further, they also utilize factually mixed sources such as Mises Institute and occasionally credible sources such as Consortium News and Politico, however they use them only to illustrate their far right views via questionable sources. Overall, we rate The Unz Review a Questionable Source due extreme right wing bias, promotion of propaganda and hate as well as utilizing poor sources. (M. Huitsing 2/12/2018)
Latest from The Unz Review
GOP Base Unmoved By MSM’s Big Lie On the Border. Build the Wall!, by John Derbyshire
Keep Babies Out, by Israel Shamir
Kim 10, Trump 0, by Eric Margolis
The Persecution of Julian Assange Proves That Western Values No Longer Exist, by Paul Craig Roberts
Was Jordan Peterson Stumped By A Simple Civil Rights Question?, by James Kirkpatrick
We signed the Pro-Truth Pledge:
please hold us accountable.
Ads do not necessarily reflect the views of MBFC