Science Signaling Journal – Bias and Credibility

Science Signaling Journal - Pro Science - Credible - Low Bias

Factual Reporting: Very High - Credible - Reliable


These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate Science Signaling Journal Pro-Science based on peer-reviewed sources and minimal editorializing of content.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Journal
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic


Science Signaling Journal ( is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and one of the world’s top academic journals. According to their about page, “Science Signaling offers researchers the most up-to-date resource for groundbreaking research and commentary in the dynamic field of cellular signaling.”

Five other peer-reviewed journals are published under the domain: Science Magazine, Science Advances, Science Immunology, Science Robotics, Science Translational Medicine. publishes articles from all publications on the website.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) owns and all its magazines. Donations, advertising, and subscriptions generate revenue.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the site publishes original news and coverage of the broad field of Signaling through networks and on cellular levels. Articles related to scientific studies do not contain loaded languages such as this, Dynamic variability in SHP-1 abundance determines natural killer cell responsiveness. The majority of content on this website and the magazine are peer-reviewed.

Editorially, Science Signaling Journal does not report on politics or produce opinion pieces. Almost all information found on the website and magazine is peer-reviewed scientific studies and discoveries. In general, they are a pro-science source that is very high in factual reporting.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Science Signaling Journal Pro-Science based on peer-reviewed sources and minimal editorializing of content. (D. Van Zandt 11/10/2021)


Last Updated on June 30, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: