Neural Development Journal – Bias and Credibility

Neural Development Journal - Pro Science - Least Biased - Medicine - Credible

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Neural Development Journal as a Pro-Science open-source journal. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

The Neural Development Journal is a peer-reviewed open-access journal published by BioMed Central (BMC) covering research on neural development. According to its about page, “Neural Development presents a special collection of articles focused on understanding neurogenesis in an array of diverse phylogenetically informative species highlighting fundamental commonalities and differences in neuronal development throughout the animal kingdom. “

Founded in 2000, BioMed Central, or BMC, is a United Kingdom-based, for-profit scientific open-access publisher. They publish more than 300 journals that are entirely online. According to their about page, “Our leading research journals include selective titles such as BMC BiologyBMC Medicine,  Genome Biology and Neural Development Journal, academic journals such as Journal of Hematology & OncologyNeural Development Journal, and Microbiome, and the BMC series, 65 inclusive journals focused on the needs of individual research communities. We also partner with leading institutions and societies to publish journals on their behalf.”

Read our profile on the UK government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

BioMed Central is owned by Springer Nature, an academic publishing company created by the May 2015 merger of Springer Science+Business Media and Holtzbrinck Publishing Group’s Nature Publishing Group, Palgrave Macmillan, and Macmillan Education. The company reported revenues of over 1 billion USD.

Analysis / Bias

Neural Development Journal is an open-access journal that publishes information and research related to neural development research. The journal primarily publishes research like this: Loss of G9a does not phenocopy the requirement for Prdm12 in the development of the nociceptive neuron lineage.



BioMed Central (BMC) is an open-access publisher of scientific journals. There are two types of Open Access Journals, legitimate and predatory, both of which charge the author for publication. Predatory journals often lack peer review and are generally considered not credible. BioMed Central is considered a legitimate, open-access publisher that is frequently indexed in PubMed. However, BMC journals have been criticized for retracting numerous studies due to fake peer reviews or poor methodology.

Although BMC has retracted some studies in other publications that were found to be of poor methodology and not thoroughly peer-reviewed, the Neural Development Journal publishes credible scientific studies that are factual and appropriately peer-reviewed.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate the Neural Development Journal as a Pro-Science open-source journal. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record. (D. Van Zandt 02/29/2024)

Source: https://neuraldevelopment.biomedcentral.com/

Last Updated on February 29, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: