Last updated on June 5th, 2021 at 01:41 pm
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.
- Overall, we rate the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Least Biased based on balanced story selection; however, editorial positions slightly lean left but still fall within least biased. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information, a clean fact check record, and being a resource for IFCN fact-checkers.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), founded in 1921, is a United States 4900-member organization, nonprofit, publisher, and think tank specializing in U.S. foreign policy and international affairs. The CFR meetings convene government officials, global business leaders, and prominent intelligence and foreign-policy community members to discuss international issues.
Funded by / Ownership
The Council on Foreign Relations is funded through “member dues; annual giving by members (in recent years, over one-third of CFR members have chosen to participate); corporate memberships; Foreign Affairs magazine (subscriptions, advertising, events); grants from foundations, corporations, and individuals; investment returns from its endowment; and rental income from outside use of CFR’s New York and Washington facilities.”
Analysis / Bias
In review, CFR’s mission is to be “a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries.”
The CFR website reports news with minimal bias in wording such as this: North Korea’s Military Capabilities. This story is properly sourced to NPR and Reuters, among other High factual sources. When reporting on the Trump administration, they tend to have a slightly negative view of President Trump’s foreign policy: Trouble With the Facts When Trump Meets Imran Khan.
The Council on Foreign Relations has faced criticism from conservatives due to their alleged support for globalism and a one world government. CFR has also been criticized by conspiracy theorists who feel they are a part of the New World Order. In general, CFR reports news accurately and with minimal bias. They do not advocate for war and generally promote peaceful solutions to foreign affairs issues.
Failed Fact Checks
- None to date
Overall, we rate the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Least Biased based on balanced story selection; however, editorial positions slightly lean left but still fall within least biased. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information, a clean fact check record, and for being a resource for IFCN fact-checkers. (D. Van Zandt 8/29/2016) Updated (6/05/2021)