National Geographic – Bias and Credibility

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

• Overall, we rate National Geographic a Pro-Science source based on proper sourcing and accurate, factual science coverage.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

National Geographic is the official magazine and website of the National Geographic Society. It has been published continuously since its first issue in 1888. It primarily contains articles about geography, history, and world culture.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The magazine is owned by National Geographic Partners, a joint venture between the National Geographic Society and The Walt Disney Company. The Society is a nonprofit based in Washington DC. Revenue is generated through subscriptions and magazine sales.

Analysis / Bias

In review, National Geographic covers topics through photos, videos, and articles related to history, conservation, culture, and science. There is minimal bias, and they are generally considered a pro-science source. All articles are well-sourced.

Failed Fact Checks

• None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate National Geographic a Pro-Science source based on proper sourcing and accurate, factual science coverage. (8/26/2016) (D. Van Zandt 12/08/2022)

Source: https://www.nationalgeographic.com