Flag & Cross – Bias and Credibility

Flag & Cross - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Republican - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of , transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy anfact-checkedfact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Flag & Cross Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, use of poor sources, lack of transparency with ownership, and several failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, Failed Fact Checks, Conspiracy, Propaganda, Pseudoscience
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


Founded in 2018, Flag & Cross is a hyper-partisan conservative news and opinion website. According to thei,r about page, “Our site is dedicated to the millions of Americans who want to live in a freer nation: a country that regulates less, taxes less, protects all its people regardless of race or religion or sex, guards its borders, supports its military, defends the second amendment, and is vocally pro-life.”

The website lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership.

Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Flag & Cross does not openly disclose ownership. However, the domain is registered to Romulus, owned by Brandon Vallorani. Romulus operates other conservative websites such as Great American Politics and Constitution.com. According to a press release, the website is owned by CBMJ (Conservative Broadcast Media & Journalism). Advertising and the sale of conservative-themed merchandise generate revenue.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Flag & Cross does not produce original news but adds conservative commentary to existing news stories from other sources. Articles and headlines often contain emotionally loaded wording that favors the right and denigrates the left, such as this: Indictments Coming Soon In FBI’s Mishandling of Russia Collusion Investigation, Obama Scandal. This story is sourced to Fox Business. The website also features a section called the Right Report, which links to news stories from questionable conservative sources such as Conservative Firing Line, American Freedom Fighters, and DC Dirty Laundry.

Editorially, Flag & Cross demonstrates a strong pro-Christian and pro-Conservative bias through support for limited government, 2nd amendment rights, and anti-abortion stances. They also promote religious pseudoscience such as this: Is Covid-19 A Judgment From Above? — The Need for Some Clarity and this God’s Final Dispensation – Seven Reasons Why the World Won’t See It. When it comes to science, they promote misinformation regarding climate change, Covid-19, and stolen election conspiracies. See the fact checks below. In general, Flag & Cross is a far-right website that does

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Flag & Cross Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, use of poor sources, lack of transparency with ownership, and several failed fact checks. (D. Van Zandt 4/19/2020) Updated (07/27/2022)

Source: https://flagandcross.com/

Last Updated on May 24, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: