These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate the Arms Control Association Left-Center biased based on editorial and policy advocacy that slightly favors the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Factual Reporting: HIGH
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
Founded in 1971, the Arms Control Association is a “national nonpartisan membership organization dedicated to promoting public understanding of and support for effective arms control policies.” The Arms Control Association regularly releases press briefings and publishes the magazine Arms Control Today.
The Arms Control Association has a lengthy history of promoting arms control, negotiations and peace. For space purposes we will share their most recent history. You can view their entire history here.
2017: The Arms Control Association help rally opposition to the President Trump’s threats of “fire and fury” against North Korea for its nuclear and missile tests and successfully make the case for direct U.S.-North Korean diplomacy on denuclearization and peace.
2018: The Arms Control Association advance options to resolve the U.S.-Russian dispute over Russian compliance with the INF Treaty and mobilized bipartisan support for a decision to extend the New START agreement past 2021.
2018: Responding to the Trump administration’s unilateral withdrawal from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, the Arms Control Association warns that the move will unnecessarily trigger a new nuclear crisis. Along with nongovernmental allies, the Association builds support for U.S. re-entry into the agreement and follow-on talks on an agreement that builds on the 2015 deal.
2019: The Arms Control Association’s major research report “Nuclear Excess: Understanding the Costs, Risks, and Alternatives” documents why the Trump administration’s $1.7 trillion, 30 year plan for nuclear weapons recapitalization plans is unnecessary, unsustainable and unsafe, and outlines realistic options to significantly reduce nuclear weapons spending.
Funded by / Ownership
The Arms Control Association is a nonprofit that is supported through grants and donations. The website lists their most notable contributors, which are as follows:
- Carnegie Corporation of New York
- Charles Koch Foundation
- German Foreign Federal Office
- Janelia Foundation
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- New-Land Foundation
- Open Society Foundations
- Pentagon Budget Campaign and the Colombe Foundation
- Ploughshares Fund
- Prospect Hill Foundation
- Selma Ankist Family Trust
- Stewart R. Mott Charitable Trust
- The Susan A. and Donald P. Babson Foundation
Revenue is additionally generated through magazine subscriptions.
Analysis / Bias
In review, the Arms Control Association promotes denuclearization through organizing summits and publishing research and information. The website has a tab leading to “Resources.” This page links to a library of information that is low biased and evidence based. You can also read articles from their magazine, Arms Control Today, which utilizes moderately loaded language that is negative toward President Trump’s Iranian Nuclear plan: Seeing Red in Trump’s Iran Strategy. Further, the website features a blog that publishes Op-Ed’s from other sources such as The Nation (Left), The National Interest (Right-Center), Axios (Left-Center) and Defense One (Least Biased). Editorially, the common theme is opposition to arms proliferation and the current administration’s handling of foreign affairs. In general, all information is factual and properly sourced with a left leaning editorial bias.
A factual search reveals they have never failed a fact check.
Overall, we rate the Arms Control Association Left-Center biased based on editorial and policy advocacy that slightly favors the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. (D. Van Zandt 7/22/2019)