Covid Call to Humanity – Bias and Credibility

Covid Call to Humanity - Conspiracy - Fake News - Conservative - Not CredibleCovid Call to Humanity - Pseudoscience - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Very Low - Biased - Not Credible - Fake News


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation are recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Covid Call to Humanity as a CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE site because it promotes alternative and often unsupported viewpoints on the COVID-19 pandemic and other topics. The site frequently leans into conspiracy theory narratives, suggesting hidden agendas without substantial evidence, and often lacks external validation for its claims.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
Country: Philippines
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Founded by Nicanor Perlas, Covid Call to Humanity claims to offer alternative perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic, challenging mainstream narratives. It presents itself as a wake-up call to humanity. Nicanor Perlasis, also the research head and analyst of the website, is responsible for its accuracy, coherence, and relevance. He is based in the Philippines and also manages a bio-dynamic farm. The website has a team of young researchers who prefer to remain anonymous.

Read our profile on the Philippines media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

The site’s funding sources are undisclosed, with Nicanor Perlas identified as the founder.

Analysis / Bias

Covid Call to Humanity publishes content that frequently leans towards conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. An article titled “Alex Jones: Biden admin preparing to bring back full COVID restrictions, rollout to begin by September” references conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and lacks credible sources to substantiate its claims. The article’s editor’s note suggests a “hidden agenda” behind governmental health measures, a narrative often not supported by evidence but common in conspiracy theories. As such, they claim only a select group, like Alex Jones and his followers, know the government’s “true” motives.

Another piece, “Biometric Digital ID Systems: A Path Towards Total Control,” critiques the MOSIP, a digital ID platform funded by the Gates Foundation, using emotionally loaded language to imply malevolent intentions behind digital IDs. This also aligns with a common feature of conspiracy theories, where only a select group (in this case, the author and like-minded individuals) are thought to be aware of the “true” motives behind widely accepted practices or technologies. The lack of credible sources to substantiate these claims further adds to its conspiratorial nature. The article cites “Fully Human” as its source, another website delving into transhumanism and “humanity’s quest for technological immortality.” The fact that the article relies on a source promoting alternative viewpoints and theories creates a self-referential information loop lacking external validation.



While the website occasionally cites credible sources, the interpretation and presentation of these sources often promote biased or conspiratorial viewpoints, which can be misleading for readers who may not go to the sources to see how they have been interpreted or skewed.

Failed Fact Checks 

Overall, we rate Covid Call to Humanity as a CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE site because it promotes alternative and often unsupported viewpoints on the COVID-19 pandemic and other topics. The site frequently leans into conspiracy theory narratives, suggesting hidden agendas without substantial evidence, and often lacks external validation for its claims. (M. Huitsing 08/30/2023)

Source: covidcalltohumanity.org

Last Updated on September 6, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: