A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Today Breaking News Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, poor sourcing, plagiarism, and a complete lack of transparency.
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Poor Sourcing, Plagiarism, Lack of Transparency
World Press Freedom Rank: Panama 79/180
Founded in 2018, Today Breaking News is a website that publishes USA news. The website completely lacks transparency as they do not list authors, provide an about page or disclose ownership. According to a domain search the website domain is registered in Panama.
Funded by / Ownership
Today Breaking News does not disclose ownership and revenue is generated through advertising.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Today Breaking News does not publish original content, but rather summarizes news articles and offers far right biased opinions. Articles often contain loaded emotional language such as this: Breaking: State Department Finds Hillary Guilty. This story is copy and pasted (plagiarized) from a source called the Bearded Patriot. In another story, Ilhan Omar’s Daughter Vows To Boot Trump From Office Unless He Changes Course of Admin, there is a complete absence of hyperlinked sourcing. In general, story selection always favors the right and denigrates the left while not offering sources for their information. In other words, this is not a credible website on any level.
Overall, we rate Today Breaking News Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, poor sourcing, plagiarism, and a complete lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt 10/26/2019)