Project Drawdown – Bias and Credibility

Project Drawdown - Pro Science - Least Biased - Science - Credible

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate Project Drawdown as a left-leaning Pro-Science source based on advocacy for climate change reversal. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to the use of pro-science sources and a clean fact-check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Project Drawdown is a nonprofit organization registered under 501(c)(3). The organization conducts research and advocates for climate solutions that can help the world achieve a drawdown, which is the period when greenhouse gases in the atmosphere start to decrease after reaching their peak. The organization’s headquarters is in San Francisco, CA, where Jennifer Caldwell is president.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Project Drawdown is a nonprofit organization. It is funded through individual and institutional donations. The organization is transparent about its funding sources, listed on the Donors List page (2022). The list of board of directors can also be found on the website.

Analysis / Bias

In our review of content from Project Drawdown, the organization consistently showcases scientifically-backed solutions to address climate change. The book “Drawdown” details 100 extensively researched solutions to reverse global warming.

For instance, one of their articles, “Electricity Generation,”  primarily focuses on the environmental impact of electricity generation, the historical reliance on fossil fuels, and the need to transition towards renewable energy sources.



The article emphasizes the importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and the potential benefits of shifting away from fossil fuels. The information is presented with a clear reliance on data, emphasizing the feasibility and benefits of the proposed solutions. While it doesn’t mention any political party, its focus on environmental concerns and equity suggests a left-leaning tendency. In the U.S., Republicans typically favor fossil fuels.

Project Drawdown cites the 2019 Tracking SDG7 Report, published by the ESMAP, which is a global program of the World Bank that helps developing countries achieve sustainable energy goals and Pro-science sources such as The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

Another article, “Food, Agriculture, and Land Use,” highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture in addressing climate change and the effects of human activities on land. The article promotes sustainable land management, ecosystem protection, and improved farming practices to curb emissions and guarantee food security. It suggests solutions like Conservation agriculture, referencing sources from pnas.org and archive.ipcc.ch.

In summary, Project Drawdown provides well-researched and scientifically supported solutions to combat climate change. Their content is presented in a neutral tone, focusing on data and expert insights.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Project Drawdown as a left-leaning Pro-Science source based on advocacy for climate change reversal. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to the use of pro-science sources and a clean fact-check record. (M. Huitsing 09/23/2023)

Source: https://www.drawdown.org/

Last Updated on September 23, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: