Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Share:

Bulletin of Atomic Scientist - Left Center Biased - Pro-Science - Liberal - Democrat - CredibleFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


LEFT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists slightly left-biased we also rate them Pro-Science overall for well-sourced scientific information.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: United Kingdom
World Press Freedom Rank: UK 35/180

History

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists is a nontechnical academic journal, published by Taylor and Francis that covers global security and public policy issues related to the dangers posed by nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, climate change, and emerging technologies and diseases. It has been published continuously since 1945.

Read our profile on UK Media and Government.

Funded by / Ownership

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists is owned and published by Taylor and Francis which is an international company originating in England that publishes books and academic journals. Revenue is derived through donations, subscription fees, and an online store that sells branded merchandise.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists publishes news and information related to the science of nuclear weapons and their potential dangers. Articles and headlines often touch on political subjects as they are researching and discussing dangers posed to the planet such as this Here’s what to expect from Biden on top nuclear weapons issues. Many of the issues covered on this website align with the political left such as concern for Climate Change and nuclear threats Private, centralized storage for spent nuclear fuel: A dead end or path forward? Although the information is factual and pro-science, there is a slight left-leaning bias in their positions.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None to date

Overall, we rate the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists slightly Left-Center biased, we also rate them Pro-Science overall for well-sourced scientific information. (D. Van Zandt 12/4/2016) Updated (11/18/2020)

Source: https://thebulletin.org/

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Video Advertisement