Presidential Hill

Presidential Hill is Right Biased, conservative and Questionable with low credibility and reliability.Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing of credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Presidential Hill as far-right biased and questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience. Further, they utilize poor sources, have made false claims, and completely lack transparency.

Detailed Report

Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Pseudoscience, False Claims, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Presidential Hill is a conservative-leaning news and opinion website. According to their about page, they claim they are “a fact-based news publication specializing in reports on politics and current events from an objective point of view.”

The website lacks transparency as it does not disclose its conservative leanings or name authors, editors, and ownership. The domain is registered with information redacted for privacy.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Presidential Hill lacks transparency as they do not provide ownership information. However, the contact page provides a physical mailing address @ 1985 Henderson Rd STE 1156 Columbus, OH 43220. This address leads to a strip mall and a company called Pak Mail, which provides shipping services and personal and business mailbox rentals. It appears Patriotic Post has rented a mailbox with Pak Mail.

Further, when searching the mailing address, we found several other conservative websites linked to this mailbox rental. This is what we have discovered thus far:

These websites have the same design and appear to be owned by the same company/person. Advertising generates revenue.

Analysis / Bias

Presidential Hill does not conduct original reporting. Instead, they curate news from other sources and add conservative commentary. Articles and headlines feature loaded emotional wording such as this CNN Host Gets Attacked By Democrats For Calling Out Biden’s Improper Use Of Troops. A biased quote from the article reads: “Biden is the fascist. The tweeting loons have it entirely backward.” This story does not provide a source.

Regarding sourcing, most articles do not utilize hyperlinked sourcing which is unacceptable for a web-only publication. In reviewing numerous articles, we found they generally rely on questionable right biased sources such as American Greatness, Breitbart, and Judicial Watch.

Editorially, most stories strongly favor the right, and former President Donald Trump, such as this Trump Surges 10 Points After FBI Raid, A Reversal From Expectations. Our review also found instances of promoting debunked conspiracy theories, such as this Rancher Says CCP And Bill Gates’ Purchase Of Land Is About Planned Food Shortages. This is debunked conspiracy theory.

Finally, Presidential Hill has promoted Covid-19 disinformation. In general, Presidential Hill is a far-right biased source that promotes conspiracy theories and pseudoscience that are not rooted in fact.

Failed Fact Checks

  • There is no record of them being fact-checked by a third party. See above.

Overall, we rate Presidential Hill as far-right biased and questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience. Further, they utilize poor sources, have made false claims, and completely lack transparency. (D. Van Zandt (09/14/2022)

Source: https://presidentialhill.com/

Last Updated on September 29, 2022 by Media Bias Fact Check

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources