LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Pantsuit Politics as Left-Center biased based on its socially liberal tone and empathy-driven commentary. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to transparent funding, consistent sourcing from reputable institutions, and balanced, conversational analysis designed to bridge partisan divides.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.0)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.5)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website/Podcast
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Pantsuit Politics is an independent political podcast and Substack publication founded in 2015 by Sarah Stewart Holland and Beth Silvers, two attorneys and longtime friends from Kentucky. Initially introduced as “Sarah from the Left” and “Beth from the Right,” the show was designed to encourage civil, grace-filled political dialogue between differing perspectives. Over time, both hosts’ views became more aligned—center-left and pragmatic—leading them to describe the podcast as “a guide to grace-filled political conversation.”
Read our profile in the United States Government and Media.
Funded by / Ownership
Pantsuit Politics operates as a listener-supported Substack publication and independent podcast. It has no corporate investors or advertising influence, relying entirely on paid subscriptions and community memberships. The pair also sells branded merchandise through Shopify, generating additional income.
Analysis / Bias
Pantsuit Politics provides a measured, empathetic, and conversational approach to political news, positioning itself as a bridge between polarized viewpoints. While the tone is less partisan than traditional left-wing commentary, its content leans progressive, reflecting the hosts’ evolution from bipartisan dialogue toward liberal-leaning cultural analysis.
In “Why Is Health Insurance So Expensive?”, the hosts analyze healthcare economics using data from reputable sources like the Kaiser Family Foundation and The Economist, blending factual reporting with personal reflection. They acknowledge conservative critiques (e.g., Paragon Institute studies) while framing the discussion empathetically toward middle-class financial strain, displaying balance within a progressive context.
Episodes such as “The Great Feminization Debate Continues” discuss gender discourse with nuance, rejecting divisive identity politics while defending feminist principles. In “Spicy Bonus: The Good News Edition”, the hosts interpret election outcomes through a center-left lens, praising progressive victories and critiquing political stagnation under the Biden administration while condemning right-wing polarization.
The program’s tone is conversational, analytical, and reflective rather than confrontational. While its framing favors socially liberal and empathetic narratives, it remains less ideologically rigid than partisan outlets like The Daily Beast.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Pantsuit Politics as Left-Center biased based on its socially liberal tone and empathy-driven commentary. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to transparent funding, consistent sourcing from reputable institutions, and balanced, conversational analysis designed to bridge partisan divides. (D. Van Zandt 11/15/2025)
Source: https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/
Last Updated on November 15, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources