Metro Weekly - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

Overall, we rate Metro Weekly as left-biased due to its strong advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights and progressive social issues. Despite this, it is rated high in factual reporting due to its commitment to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Metro Weekly is an LGBTQ+ Weekly Magazine established in 1994 in Washington, D.C. The publication covers various topics relevant to the LGBTQ+ community, including local and national news, interviews, and event information.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Jansi LLC owns Metro Weekly, and Randy Shulman is the magazine’s publisher and editor-in-chief. The magazine’s revenue streams include advertising, memberships, and donations.

Analysis / Bias

Metro Weekly’s reporting focuses primarily on LGBTQ+ issues and advocacy. The publication’s narrative is tailored towards the community’s interests, advocating for LGBTQ+ rights and awareness through its content.

The article “Idaho Bans Health Care Coverage for Transgender Adults” discusses Idaho’s new legislation prohibiting Medicaid from covering gender-affirming treatments for transgender people. It has a left-leaning bias by emphasizing the negative consequences of the legislation on transgender individuals’ rights and well-being. The language and narrative choices present the law as a setback for transgender rights, aligning with progressive viewpoints that prioritize inclusivity and access to healthcare for all, especially marginalized groups like the transgender community. This approach indicates a perspective that is supportive of LGBTQ+ rights, typical of left-center media. Using sources like legislature.idaho.gov and Idaho Capital Sun in Metro Weekly’s reporting indicates reliable factual accuracy, as these are primary and respected local news sources.

Another article we analyzed, titled “Trolls Hate on No. 1 NFL Draft Pick for Pink Phone and Nail Polish,” covers the negative public reaction to an NFL draft pick’s gender-nonconforming appearance, sourcing mainstream media outlets like Sports Illustrated, Yahoo News, People Magazine, and lesser-known fansided.com. The article uses emotionally loaded language to describe the backlash Caleb Williams faced for his appearance, with phrases like “feigning outrage” and “accusing him of pushing a social agenda.” Such language conveys a strong defense of Williams. It critiques the negative societal reactions, indicating a bias toward supporting gender nonconformity and challenging traditional gender norms, suggesting an alignment with progressive perspectives on gender identity and expression. Despite its emotionally loaded language and advocacy perspective, Metro Weekly maintains high factual reporting through accurate and transparent sourcing. The publication effectively balances advocacy with factual content, ensuring clear distinctions between opinion and fact-based reporting.

Failed Fact Checks

None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Metro Weekly as left-biased due to its strong advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights and progressive social issues. Despite this, it is rated high in factual reporting due to its commitment to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. (M. Huitsing 04/07/2024)

Source: https://www.metroweekly.com/

Last Updated on April 7, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check