Climate Action Tracker

Last updated on November 20th, 2020 at 06:21 pm

Climate Action Tracker - Pro Science - Credible - Not Biased

Factual Reporting: Very High - Credible - Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate Climate Action Tracker a Pro-Science source based on scientific methodology and adherence to the consensus of science.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: Germany
World Press Freedom Rank: Germany 11/180

History

Founded in 2009, Climate Action Tracker is an independent science-based assessment, which tracks the emission commitments and actions of countries. The website provides an up-to-date assessment of individual national pledges to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. They have a well-sourced Methodology.

View our profile on Germany’s media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Climate Action Tracker is owned by Climate Analytics and NewClimate Institute gGmbH, which conducts research and analysis to support the international climate negotiations, including options for the implementation of the Paris Agreement. Funding is provided by “ClimateWorks Foundation, the European Climate Foundation, and the German Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) via the International Climate Initiative.”

Analysis / Bias

In review, the website features a map that highlights countries by how well they are complying with the Paris Climate Agreement. For example, the United States is rated as CRITICALLY INSUFFICIENT, while Canada is rated as INSUFFICIENT, and India as 2°C COMPATIBLE. For the most part, almost every country is insufficient or worse. The website also features reports such as this Scaling up climate action in Australia. In general, the information contained on this website is low biased and factual.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None to date

Overall, we rate Climate Action Tracker a Pro-Science source based on scientific methodology and adherence to the consensus of science. (12/23/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 11/20/2020)

Source: https://climateactiontracker.org/

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

NFN-Low Biased Factual News

Video Advertisement

Share: