Borgen Magazine – Bias and Credibility

Borgen Project - Left Center Bias - Liberal - Democrat - CredibleFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


LEFT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

  • Overall, based on their selection of left-leaning stories, we rate The Borgen Project as left-center biased. We also rate them high for factual reporting due to their use of credible sourcing and a clean fact-check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2003 by Clint Borgen, Borgen Magazine, is an online initiative of The Borgen Project that advocates for poverty-reducing legislation, mobilizes global support, and raises awareness about extreme poverty. It is headquartered in Tacoma, WA.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The Borgen Magazine is funded through donations as a registered 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. The magazine is part of The Borgen Project.

Analysis / Bias

Borgen Magazine is part of the Borgen Project; therefore, typically, they provide articles written by the Borgen Project, such as “American Politicians Who Have Battled Global Poverty.” It highlights the efforts of five politicians who have worked to reduce poverty worldwide. The politicians they mention are George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, John McCain, and Bill Clinton. The article sources information from credible sources such as bushcenter.org, The HillGlobal Citizen, and Vote Smart.

The magazine, which is part of The Borgen Project, leans towards a left-center bias as it focuses on left-leaning advocacy positions and relies on credible sourcing from official government websites and reputable sources such as senate.gov, congress.gov, and read.oecd-ilibrary.org. The article “The READ Act Reauthorization Act of 2023” emphasizes the severity of the worldwide education crisis and the need for legislative action to address it, particularly for vulnerable populations and girls. It is written in a balanced tone, holds left-leaning advocacy positions, and is fact-based in reporting.



Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, based on their selection of left-leaning stories, we rate Borgen Magazine as left-center biased. We also rate them high for factual reporting due to their use of credible sourcing and a clean fact-check record. (M. Huitsing 06/06/2023)

Source: https://www.borgenmagazine.com/

This poll is for entertainment purposes and does not change our overall rating.

Last Updated on June 6, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: