Good Magazine – Bias and Credibility

Good Magazine - Left Bias - Liberal - Progressive - Democrat - CredibleFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate Good Magazine Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that routinely favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Good is a quarterly magazine that was launched in 2006. The magazine covers a variety of topics that are geared toward positive social and environmental change.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Good Magazine is owned by Good Worldwide, which is a company with offices in Los Angeles, New York, and Seattle that reports on businesses and non-profits. They also publish the website Upworthy. Revenue is generated through advertising, an online store, and subscription fees.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Good publishes news and commentary from a liberal/progressive perspective. Articles and headlines often use emotionally loaded wording that denigrates the right such as this Fox News uses the word ‘hate’ far more often than MSNBC or CNN. When reporting on conservatives, they often present a negative tone, such as this Trump denounced for falsely claiming presidential election victory.

Editorially, Good frequently reports in the environment with concern for climate change 416 PPM: Carbon in atmosphere hits new record high and no one is talking about it. Other positions held are pro-human rights, pro-choice and pro-science positions on Covid-19. Generally, the news is reported factually and with a strong left-leaning bias.



Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Good Magazine Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that routinely favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 12/9/2016) Updated (11/26/2022)

Source: https://www.good.is/

Last Updated on May 24, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: