AND Magazine

AND Magazine - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Mixed Credible and Reliable


These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

  • AND Magazine is currently pending or under review. When deciding to evaluate a source, we do a preliminary investigation to determine if the source qualifies for review. Qualifications include high traffic, popularity, controversy, strong bias, and the potential for false or misleading information.

About Page: AND Magazine lacks transparency as they do not have an about page. The co-owner and editor are listed as Gina Faddis. Their LinkedIn page describes them as “It has become sport to demonize those who do not think exactly as we do. Words like “nazi,” “fascist,” “racist,” and “communist” fly with abandon. Where once we prided ourselves on our unity and our collective strength, we now celebrate division and hate speech. This site is about something fundamentally different. It is about civil discourse. It is about the free exchange of ideas. It is about adult conversation.”

Media Type: Website
Assessment Type: Traffic overview, Headlines, Background
Preliminary Assessment:
Low to Medium Credibility
Bias: Politically Right Biased and possibly Questionable or Conspiracy related.
Country: USA
Confidence of Initial Assessment: Medium
Failed Fact Checks: None in the Last 5 years


Last Updated on June 22, 2021 by Media Bias Fact Check

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources