Daily Source Bias Check: Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

TOPICS:

Posted By: Media Bias Fact Check

Vaccine Safety Research Foundation - Conspiracy - Fake News - Conservative - Not CredibleVSRF - Pseudoscience - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation are recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF) as a conspiracy-pseudoscience website based on the promotion of false and unproven claims related to Covid-19 and its associated vaccines.

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Source: https://www.vacsafety.org/

Read Detailed Report

★ SUPPORT OUR MISSION

MBFC relies entirely on readers like you.

No corporate or political donors. Your support keeps our 11,000+ ratings 100% independent.

Starting at $3 /month — ad-free + exclusive content
  • Remove all ads instantly
  • Support independent ratings
  • Cancel any time — no strings
★ Go Ad-Free — from $3/mo ❤ One-Time Donation Data API Access
Membership removes ads • Donations do not

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Subscribe With Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to MBFC and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 22K other subscribers

SHARE TWEET PIN

Related Articles

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Richard Babylon

What a name! With a rating like that (it could barely be any worse), it seems that neither Safety nor Research can reliably be associated with anything they publish.

Just a guess, but it sounds like Steve Kirsch might, like Elon Musk, be a well-intentioned man who’s a victim of his own success/ego in that he thinks being knowledgeable and successful in one area means he’s qualified to pontificate in others, without the relevant education.

0