LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate The Sierra Club as left-biased due to its advocacy for progressive policies. We also rate them as mostly factual rather than high due to the promotion of misleading information regarding GMOs.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Established in 1892 by preservationist John Muir, The Sierra Club is the nation’s largest grassroots environmental organization. It has a long history of environmental advocacy, including participation in civil resistance actions and legal efforts to promote environmental protection. Allison Chin, the current president of the Sierra Club, leads the organization from its headquarters in Oakland, California.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
The Sierra Club is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization primarily funded through donations. It has published its financial statements, including the IRS Form 990, and audited financial statements for multiple years. The Sierra Club is rated by Charity Navigator and has received a four-star rating from the organization.
Analysis / Bias
The Sierra Club’s Sierra magazine extensively covers environmental issues, from climate and energy to wilderness preservation and green living. Articles like “Wisconsin’s Warmest Winter” provide factual reporting on the effects of climate change on local economies, backed by reputable sources such as USA Today and the Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts Tourism and Outdoor Recreation Working Group and firsthand accounts.
Another story, “Appalachian Organizations Are Working to Make the Region a Hub for Green Manufacturing and Clean Energy,” explores economic and environmental transformation in Appalachia, supported by initiatives funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. This indicates Sierra’s engagement with sustainable economic development topics. It cites specific initiatives and partnerships, such as the Next Manufacturing Task Force and ReImagine Appalachia, to illustrate the collaborative efforts toward sustainable economic development.
However, the magazine’s advocacy becomes apparent in pieces like “Vice President Harris Is Fighting for Reproductive Freedom” which portrays Harris positively for her work in reproductive rights, indicating a supportive editorial bias.
While the Sierra Club is reasonably pro-science on issues like climate change, they are not when it comes to GMOs. They promote the dangers of GMOs and further testing as well as ban: “We call for a ban on the planting of all genetically engineered crops and the release of all GEOs into the environment, including those now approved, pending improved regulatory procedures and safety testing.” GMOs have been tested and researched for more than 30 years with a consensus that they are safe.
According to a The New York Times‘ report the shifting pattern of donations, with a growing emphasis on climate change, may affect the Sierra Club’s thematic focus and resource allocation. While the exact impact of this financial trend is uncertain, it suggests a potential shift in the organization’s priorities, possibly influencing the breadth and depth of coverage across various environmental issues.
Sierra magazine generally provides thorough environmental reporting, blending factual analysis with advocacy. The changing landscape of donor contributions could subtly influence its future editorial and coverage priorities, hinting at an evolving focus that may increasingly emphasize climate-related issues.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the last 5 years.
Overall, we rate The Sierra Club as left-biased due to its advocacy for progressive policies. We also rate them as mostly factual rather than high due to the promotion of misleading information regarding GMOs. (M. Huitsing 03/16/2024)
Source: https://www.sierraclub.org/
Last Updated on April 10, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources