The Hayride

Share:

Mixed Factual Reporting - Not always Credible

The Hayride - Right Bias - Conservative - Republican - Libertarian - Not CredibleRIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate The Hayride Right biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of questionable sources when it comes to climate science, as well as a few failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180

History

The Hayride is a news and commentary blog founded in December 2009. The Hayride functions as an opinion based group blog about Louisiana and national politics. The founder and publisher is Scott McKay. According to their about page “The Hayride has been Louisiana’s premier conservative political commentary site. We’re a group blog covering Louisiana and national politics and current affairs.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website does not openly disclose ownership, however Scott McKay is listed as founder and publisher. Revenue is generated through advertising and donations are accepted at Hayride Media LLC. The website also features a link to an online store, but on the day of this review the site returns “this page cannot be reached.”

Analysis / Bias

In review, The Hayride primarily reports on Louisiana and national politics. Local political news reporting is often opinion based and uses loaded emotional wording such as this: SADOW: Edwards Is Awfully Ironic In Accusing Rispone Of Lacking Detail. This story is properly sourced to numerous high factual sources such as the Associated Press and Pew Research. Story selection always favors the right and often endorses President Trump such as this: BURLAND: Louisiana Should Dump JBE If We Want To Join The Trump Economy. National news stories also feature loaded emotional wording that favors the right, CROUERE: Deep State Hates Trump’s America-First Policy

When it comes to reporting on scientific issues such as climate change, some of their authors are not in agreement with the consensus that humans are a significant driver of climate change. In this article they state “Ironically, despite the hysteria, there is not scientific consensus that man-made climate change is even real, Numerous studies, such as the research conducted by S. Fred Singer, show that the theory that climate change is man-made is “in dispute.”

Singer is best known for his denial of the health risks of second hand smoke. In 2005, the left leaning Mother Jones magazine described Singer as a “godfather of global warming denial.” In August 2007 Newsweek reported that in April 1998 a dozen people from what it called “the denial machine” met at the American Petroleum Institute‘s Washington headquarters. The meeting included Singer’s group, the George C. Marshall Institute, and ExxonMobil. Newsweek said that, according to an eight-page memo that was leaked, the meeting proposed a $5-million campaign to convince the public that the science of global warming was controversial and uncertain. The plan was leaked to the press and never implemented. Lastly, according to Jeffrey Masters, Ph.D. Director of Meteorology, Weather Underground:

[Singer] has testified before Congress numerous times, and is probably the most widely quoted skeptic on the ozone hole and global warming issues. Unfortunately, Dr. Singer cannot be considered an active scientist publishing in the peer-reviewed literature, or even an objective informed critic. Dr. Singer touts himself as having “published more than 200 peer-reviewed scientific papers over the course of his career”. However, Dr. Singer’s contributions to atmospheric science have been essentially zero since 1971.

In other words, he is not a credible source who is opposed the overwhelming consensus that Human Influenced Climate Change is real and will have negative impacts for humanity.

A factual search reveals a few failed fact checks.

Overall, we rate The Hayride Right biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of questionable sources when it comes to climate science, as well as a few failed fact checks. (M. Huitsing 8/23/2017) (Updated 11/1/2019)

Source: https://thehayride.com/

[the_ad id="86448"]