The Bulwark

Last updated on May 23rd, 2021 at 12:08 pm

The Bulwark - Right Center Bias - Conservative - Republican - Libertarian - CredibleFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


RIGHT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Bulwark Right-Center Biased based on story selection and political affiliation that moderately favors the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2018 by Charlie Sykes and William Kristol, The Bulwark is a news and opinion website featuring many staff from the now-defunct right-leaning Weekly Standard. The Weekly Standard editor-in-chief Charlie Sykes said, “the murder of the Standard made it urgently necessary to create a home for rational, principled, fact-based center-right voices who Trumpism did not cow.”

Read our profile on USA Media and Government.

Funded by / Ownership

The Bulwark is a Defending Democracy Together Institute project, a 501(c)(3) conservative advocacy group led in part by The Weekly Standard co-founder William Kristol. The Bulwark and its parent company Defending Democracy Together Institute, is funded through donations. According to the right-leaning Influence Watch, Defending Democracy Together is a right-center advocacy organization primarily funded by the left-center Hewitt Foundation that is described as a “nonprofit dedicated to incubating and assembling pro-democracy voices. . . created by conservatives uncomfortable with the flamboyant rhetoric that can come from President Trump.”

Analysis / Bias

In review, The Bulwark has essentially started where the Weekly Standard left off, which is as a conservative publisher who did not support former President Trump. Please do not confuse this with a left-biased source. They are a right-leaning source and reject most progressive and mainstream democratic ideals. For example, they use moderately loaded words that denigrate Hillary Clinton: If Hillary Clinton Doesn’t Shut Up, She’ll Re-Elect Trump. Despite the loaded headline, this story is properly sourced to Know Your Meme and the Washington Post. Besides original reporting, the website also features a news aggregator that sources a variety of left, least biased, and right-leaning sources. In general, this is a moderate right-leaning source that does not support Trump. It might not be the Weekly Standard 2.0, but it is pretty close and a credible source for right-leaning information.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None to date

Overall, we rate the Bulwark Right-Center Biased based on story selection and political affiliation that moderately favors the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. (D. Van Zandt 4/30/2019) Updated (5/23/2021)

Source: https://thebulwark.com/

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

NFN-Low Biased Factual News

Video Advertisement

Share: