SingularityHub – Bias and Credibility

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

• Overall, we rate the Singularity Hub a Pro-Science source based on promoting the consensus of science and properly sourcing their stories.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

According to their about page: “Singularity Hub chronicles technological progress by highlighting the breakthroughs, players, and issues shaping the future as well as supporting a global community of smart, passionate, action-oriented people who want to change the world.”

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Singularity University owns and published the Singularity Hub. It is not clear how they generate revenue.

Analysis / Bias

The Singularity Hub primarily covers astronomy, science, and technology. Articles and headlines are well-sourced, fact-based, and present with minimal bias, such as this A Mystery Object in Space Flashed Brilliantly for 3 Months—Then Disappeared. The website also republishes articles from credible sources such as The Conversation.

Failed Fact Checks

• None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate the Singularity Hub a Pro-Science source based on promoting the consensus of science and properly sourcing their stories. (D. Van Zandt 5/5/2018) Updated (02/04/2022)

Source: https://singularityhub.com