Crisis Magazine – Bias and Credibility

Crisis Magazine - Right Bias - Conservative - Christian - Republican - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


RIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate Crisis Magazine Right Biased based on the promotion of a conservative Christian perspective. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

Crisis Magazine (CM) is a religious-based news site. According to their about page, “To this day, Crisis remains America’s most trusted source for authentic Catholic perspectives on Church and State, arts and culture, science and faith. We have one purpose, and one only: to proclaim Christ’s Kingship over all things, at all times, to all nations.”

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The Sophia Institute, a nonprofit, owns and publishes Crisis Magazine. Donations and advertising generate revenue.

Analysis / Bias

While the stories on CM are well written and use factual sources, the sources rarely bear more than a passing relevance to the conclusions drawn. Crisis Magazine uses none of the over-the-top language of other biased sites on both ends; their extremism is evident in the tone and characterizations presented in the stories. Example: In the article “Does “Climate Change” Really Cause Hunger,” CM repeats many of the half-truths and distorted “facts” popular among climate change deniers while presenting no links to any sources, credible or otherwise, for these claims.

Editorially, all stories favor a Christian Right perspective and sometimes use poor sources. Coating extremism in seemingly moderate terms makes it no less extreme, only easier to read.



Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Crisis Magazine Right Biased based on the promotion of a conservative Christian perspective. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing. (D. Kelley 11/16/2017) Updated (04/19/2024)

Source: https://www.crisismagazine.com/

Last Updated on April 19, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: