---

RIGHT BIAS

History

The Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA), formerly the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA), is a policy advocacy organization founded in 1976 and headquartered in Jerusalem.

JCFA focuses on promoting Israel’s strategic, security, and diplomatic interests through initiatives targeting Palestinian accountability, combating antisemitism, and building regional alliances. The JCFA positions itself as a counter-narrative machine against criticisms of Israeli policies, particularly regarding the Palestinian conflict.

Read our profile on Israel’s media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

JCFA is a registered Amuta (non-profit organization) in Israel and a 501(c)(3) organization in the United States, indicating active engagement with American supporters. It is funded through private donations, partnerships, and grants, though specific funding sources are not publicly disclosed.

Analysis / Bias

The Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA) positions itself as a counter to what it describes as misinformation or propaganda against Zionism, often framing criticism of Zionist ideology and the Jewish state’s policies as part of a broader pattern of antisemitism. This perspective aligns with PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s stance, as he frequently accuses critics of Israel or its policies of engaging in antisemitism. By echoing these views, JCFA exhibits a right-leaning bias, closely reflecting Netanyahu’s framing of anti-Zionism as inherently antisemitic.

An example of this approach is the article titled “The Thin Line Between Legitimate Criticism of Israel and Antisemitism.” This piece argues that terms like “apartheid,” “ethnic cleansing,” and “illegal occupation” are not only factually and legally inaccurate but are used to vilify Israel and blur the distinction between criticism of policy and antisemitism. The article emphasizes that such language, as it calls” internationally recognized buzz words,” delegitimizes Israel while fostering global biases against the Jewish state.

Critics of this perspective argue that equating criticism of Israel with antisemitism can suppress legitimate discourse. They assert it’s possible to critique a nation’s policies without harboring prejudice against its people. For instance, an article in The Nation discusses how some political figures conflate anti-Zionism with antisemitism, potentially stifling free speech and legitimate criticism of Israeli policies.

In addition to addressing Zionism, JCFA also reports on “regional security issues, as seen in “Hamas Recruits Thousands of New Fighters in Gaza.” The article references a 2021 poster for Hamas’ “Liberation Pioneers Camp” but presents the information as if it reflects ongoing events in 2025. It transitions from discussing the dated poster to claiming that Hamas has recently recruited thousands of fighters, citing “security sources” without identifying or linking to these sources. By relying on vague attributions and blending dated material with contemporary assertions, the article creates a misleading narrative that exaggerates the immediacy of Hamas’s activities while failing to meet transparency standards in sourcing.

Failed Fact Checks

• None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate the JCFA as Right Biased due to its consistent alignment with Israeli government perspectives and selective framing of regional issues. We also rate them as Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing practices such as reliance on vague or unidentified sources and occasionally misleading presentation of information. (M. Huitsing 01/09/2025)

Source: https://jcpa.org/

Last Updated on January 9, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check

---

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation

---

---

---

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources