Last updated on March 8th, 2020 at 05:04 pm
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or iino sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate the Center for Security and Policy (CSP) Questionable source based on far right neoconservative viewpoints, promotion of conspiracies related to Islam and third party claims of hate group connections.
Reasoning: Far Right, Conspiracy, Anti-Islam, Third Party Hate Group Designations
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
Founded in 1988, The Center for Security Policy (CSP) is a Washington, D.C. based national security think tank that has been widely accused of engaging in conspiracy theorizing by a range of individuals, media outlets and organizations. Its activities are focused on exposing and researching perceived jihadist threats to the United States. The Southern Poverty Law Center has described it as “a conspiracy-oriented mouthpiece for the growing anti-Muslim movement in the United States.”
Funded by / Ownership
The Center for Security Policy is a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational organization that is funded through donations. According to Wikipedia, “In 2013, CSP received donations from Boeing ($25,000); General Dynamics ($15,000); Lockheed Martin ($15,000); Northrup Grumman ($5,000); Raytheon ($20,000); and General Electric ($5,000). The group has also received $1.4 million from the Bradley Foundation.
Analysis / Bias
In review, The CSP publishes news related to USA security with a focus on the dangers of Islam. News headlines are somewhat sensationalized and often demonize Islam such as this: Gaffney: Christian persecution taking place around the world is “simply unimaginable”. This story was published on the Questionable Breitbart News.
Editorially, CSP favors President Trump such as this: The Anti-Trump Conspiracy Probe Goes Criminal and denigrates the left such as this: AOC’s Weak Attempt to Paint Trump’s Criticism of Rep. Schiff as “Anti-Semitic”. This latter story is properly sourced.
Media Bias Fact Check does not determine if a source is a hate group or not, but we do provide third party observations which you can find below.
- Frank Gaffney Jr. and the Center for Security Policy
- Trump’s Acting National Security Adviser Once Tied to Group Known for Anti-Muslim Stance
- Another anti-Muslim group wants to hold event at Trump’s Palm Beach resort, Mar-a-Lago
- CAIR ‘Appalled’ by Appointment of Trump’s New Acting National Security Adviser Who Served on Board of Anti-Muslim Hate Group
- Anti-Muslim hate groups
In general, CSP favors a neoconservative policy that is hawkish toward Islam.
A factual search reveals a failed fact check.
- Says 25 percent of U.S. Muslims “agreed that violence against Americans here in the United States is justified as a part of the global jihad.” – MOSTLY FALSE
Overall, we rate the Center for Security and Policy (CSP) Questionable source based on far right neoconservative viewpoints, promotion of conspiracies related to Islam and third party claims of hate group connections. (11/19/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 11/2/2019)