Institute for Responsible Technology – Bias and Credibility

Institute for Responsible Technology - Conspiracy - Fake News - Not CredibleInstitute for Responsible Technology - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Not Credible - GMOFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Institute for Responsible Technology as a strong Pseudoscience website that promotes anti-GMO propaganda.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2003 by self-proclaimed GMO expert Jeffrey M. Smith, the Institute for Responsible Technology is a website that reports on GMOs. Jeffrey Smith is an American consumer activist, self-published author, and former politician. He is the author of two books on genetically engineered foods, Seeds of Deception: Exposing Industry and Government Lies about the Safety of the Genetically Engineered Foods You’re Eating, and Genetic Roulette: The Gamble of Our Lives, which he made into a film in 2012. According to their about page, “The Institute for Responsible Technology is a world leader in educating policymakers and the public about genetically modified (GM) foods and crops. We investigate and report their risks and impact on health, environment, the economy, and agriculture, as well as the problems associated with current research, regulation, corporate practices, and reporting.”

They state their mission as “To protect the genetic integrity and nature’s biological evolution by preventing the outdoor release of genetically modified organisms and to protect human and animal health by preventing the use of GMOs in the food and feed supply. In addition, we seek to stop the use of toxic agricultural chemicals associated with GMOs, such as Roundup.”

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The website does not state ownership; however, it is assumed to be published and owned by Jeffrey Smith. IRT is a 501(c)(3) non-profit funded through donations.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the sole purpose of this website is to promote that GMOs are dangerous. For example, they make their case on this page GMOs and Roundup are Dangerous! They also promote corporate conspiracy theories such as this.

Rather than waste time dissecting the claims made on this website, we will simply direct you to pro-science sources of information on the safety of GMOs.

Overall, we rate the Institute for Responsible Technology as a strong Pseudoscience website that promotes anti-GMO propaganda. (D. Van Zandt 8/10/2016) Updated (01/20/2023)

Source: https://responsibletechnology.org/

Last Updated on May 26, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

Explore Similar Sources:

  1. Wyoming Institute of Technology (WIT) – Bias and Credibility
  2. Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget – Bias and Credibility
  3. Center for Democracy and Technology – Bias and Credibility
  4. MIT Technology Review – Bias and Credibility
  5. Issues in Science and Technology – Bias and Credibility