These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.

• Overall, we rate InsideSources Mostly Factual for reporting rather than High due to not always aligning with the consensus on human-influenced climate change and Right-Center biased based on story selection that moderately favors the right.

---

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

Launched in 2014, InsideSources is a technology news and opinion website. InsideSources states: “Since launching in 2014, InsideSources has become a trusted source of news, reaching upwards of 25 million readers each month. Our news and opinion content syndicates to nearly 300 of the nation’s top newspapers.” InsideSources also publishes the DC Journal, DV Journal, and NH Journal

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

InsideSources is owned by InsideSources LLC, which may or not be headed by Michael Graham, as there is a lack of transparency. It is not clear how they generate revenue.

Analysis / Bias

In review, InsideSources utilizes strong loaded words in both headlines and articles, such as “How the Trump Administration Is Siding With International Terrorists Over American Citizens.” However, they typically present both sides of political news, such as: “Deficits and Punitive Taxes: President Obama’s Latest Budget Looks a Lot Like His Past.”  InsideSources usually use credible sources to support their information, such as Weekly Standard, Washington Post, and Congress.gov.

In opinion pieces regarding economics and climate change, InsideSources has a right-leaning bias and utilizes sources such as the corporately funded American Enterprise Institute, which does not always support the consensus of science regarding climate change. Some authors regularly downplay climate change and its impacts, such as this Consider Polar Bears: Cute, Iconic — and Surprisingly Abundant. This story does not align with the consensus that Polar Bears are threatened by Sea Ice loss.

Failed Fact Checks

• None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate InsideSources Mostly Factual for reporting rather than High due to not always aligning with the consensus on human-influenced climate change and Right-Center biased based on story selection that moderately favors the right. (M. Huitsing 11/22/2017) Updated (01/20/2023)

Source: http://www.insidesources.com