Independent Science News

Last updated on September 22nd, 2020 at 04:48 pm

Independent Science News - Conspiracy - Fake News - Not CredibleIndependent Science News - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Not Credible

Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Independent Science News a moderate Pseudoscience source as they publish occasional scientific misinformation.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180


Founded in 2011, Independent Science News is a website providing news and critical comment on topics where food, agriculture, and biotechnology impact human health and the environment. Independent Science News is a part of The Bioscience Resource Project, which is a public interest organization that describes itself as providing independent research and analysis in the agriculture-related biosciences since 2006. The Bioscience resource project was founded by Drs. Allison Wilson and Jonathan Latham who claim to help remedy a perceived deficit of independent scientific analysis of genetic engineering and its risks. The Bioscience Resource Project (BRP) has been called a progressive front group posing as an independent outlet for the analysis of genetic engineering research.

Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Independent Science News is owned and operated by Bioscience Resource Project, a 501(c)(3) educational non-profit.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Independent Science News is a food, agriculture, and biotechnology science website that does not support the consensus of science on GMOs. In fact, recently they published a misleading article regarding the nutritional value of Golden Rice. The article claims “GMO Golden Rice Offers No Nutritional Benefits Says FDA.” While that may be true based on the amount of rice Americans consume, it is not accurate for developing nations where rice is a staple food. The FDA responded to this misleading claim when Marriana Naum wrote the following statement: “It is unfortunate that the statement you reference in our letter responding to BNF 158 has been misconstrued to suggest that there would be no value of the pro-vitamin A in golden rice for its use in the countries where it is intended for distribution.”

Independent Science News also has a news feed that delivers science news from a wide variety of sources. Most of the information comes from credible sources, however, some do not. For example, they use known pseudoscience websites such as Sustainable Pulse and to name a few.

Overall, we rate Independent Science News a moderate Pseudoscience source as they publish occasional scientific misinformation. (D. Van Zandt 8/27/2018) Updated (11/26/2019)


Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

NFN-Low Biased Factual News

Video Advertisement