Independent Science News – Bias and Credibility

Independent Science News - Conspiracy - Fake News - Not CredibleIndependent Science News - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Not Credible

Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Independent Science News a moderate Pseudoscience source as they publish occasional scientific misinformation.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


Founded in 2011, Independent Science News provides news and critical comment on topics where food, agriculture, and biotechnology impact human health and the environment. Independent Science News is a part of The Bioscience Resource Project, a public interest organization that has provided independent research and analysis in agriculture-related biosciences since 2006. Drs founded the Bioscience resource project. Allison Wilson and Jonathan Latham claim to help remedy a perceived deficit of independent scientific research of genetic engineering and its risks. The Bioscience Resource Project (BRP) has been called a progressive front group posing as an independent outlet for the study of genetic engineering research.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Independent Science News is owned and operated by Bioscience Resource Project, a 501(c)(3) educational non-profit.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Independent Science News is a food, agriculture, and biotechnology science website that does not support the consensus of science on GMOs. Recently they published a misleading article regarding the nutritional value of Golden Rice. The report claims, “GMO Golden Rice Offers No Nutritional Benefits Says FDA.” While that may be true based on the amount of rice Americans consume, it is not accurate for developing nations where rice is a staple food. The FDA responded to this misleading claim when Marriana Naum wrote the following statement: “It is unfortunate that the statement you reference in our letter responding to BNF 158 has been misconstrued to suggest that there would be no value of the pro-vitamin A in golden rice for its use in the countries where it is intended for distribution.”

Independent Science News also has a news feed that delivers science news from a wide variety of sources. Most of the information comes from credible sources; however, some do not. For example, they use known pseudoscience websites such as Sustainable Pulse and, to name a few.

This source has not published new content since May 2022.

Overall, we rate Independent Science News a moderate Pseudoscience source as they publish occasional scientific misinformation. (D. Van Zandt 8/27/2018) Updated (01/08/2023)


Last Updated on May 26, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: