Sustainable Pulse

Has this Media Source failed a fact check?  LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

Sustainable Pulse - Conspiracy - Fake News - Not Credible - anti-GMOSustainable Pulse - Pseudoscience- Fake News - Not Credible - anti-GMOFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Sustainable Pulse a strong pseudoscience source based on advocacy for debunked GMO claims.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

History

Founded in 2012, Sustainable Pulse provides the general public with the latest global news on GMOs, Sustainable Food and Sustainable Agriculture from their network of worldwide sources.

Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Sustainable Pulse lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership. Revenue is derived through advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the purpose of this website is to cast GMOs in a negative light with articles such as this Let Them Eat GM Cottonseed! This story is linked to GM Watch which MBFC has categorized as a quackery level pseudoscience website. In general, Sustainable Pulse routinely reports anti-GMO Propaganda without a peer-reviewed source. In general, all stories report negatively on GMOs.

Overall, we rate Sustainable Pulse a strong pseudoscience source based on advocacy for debunked GMO claims.  (D. Van Zandt 9/29/2016) Updated (8/13/2020)

Source: https://sustainablepulse.com/

Media Bias Fact Check LogoProtecting you from fake news sites since 2015

[the_ad id="86448"]