HealthDay - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate HealthDay as Least Biased due to its commitment to providing neutral, evidence-based health news. We also rate its reporting as high in factual accuracy, as it relies on credible sources and maintains strict editorial standards. However, recent shifts within government-related agencies, including the restructuring of the EPA and CDC and evolving concerns over WhiteHouse.gov as a source, may impact the reliability of some referenced information moving forward.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.6)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.8)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

HealthDay is a producer and syndicator of health news, established in 1998 to provide health information to both consumers and medical professionals. Operating under ScoutNews LLC, HealthDay covers various health topics, including the latest medical research, health policy, and consumer health advice. Andy Meyers is the CEO of HealthDay, which is headquartered in New York.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

HealthDay is owned by ScoutNews LLC. The organization generates revenue through content licensing, syndicated content to various clients, and advertising.

Analysis / Bias

HealthDay focuses on delivering evidence-based health news and information. The platform covers a variety of health-related topics while maintaining a neutral and balanced approach, avoiding any clear political bias. For instance, an article titled “EPA Will Spend $5.8 Billion to Help Clean Up U.S. Drinking Water” reports on environmental health initiatives with references to sources such as EPA, ScienceDirect, CDC, and WhiteHouse.gov. As of 2025, the credibility of WhiteHouse.gov has been questioned by some observers, while institutions like EPA and CDC are undergoing restructuring, which may affect their long-term role in public health.

Another article, “U.S. Ends Funding for Thousands of Global Health Programs,” discusses changes in public health funding and presents the information straightforwardly.

Additionally, an article titled “Trump Administration Puts Freeze on Release of Health Info From Government Agencies,” originally sourced from the Associated Press, covers adjustments to health information releases by government agencies during the Trump administration. The article details the policy change and its potential impact on public health communication. While the framing primarily focuses on concerns about transparency, it does not explicitly include perspectives supporting the decision.

Generally, HealthDay’s content is characterized by a focus on factual reporting. The platform relies on reputable sources, though some of these sources are undergoing structural or credibility-related changes.

Failed Fact Checks

None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate HealthDay as Least Biased due to its commitment to providing neutral, evidence-based health news. We also rate its reporting as high in factual accuracy, as it relies on credible sources and maintains strict editorial standards. However, recent shifts within government-related agencies, including the restructuring of the EPA and CDC and evolving concerns over WhiteHouse.gov as a source, may impact the reliability of some referenced information moving forward. (M. Huitsing 03/13/2025)

Source: https://www.healthday.com/

Last Updated on March 13, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check