Gingrich 360 – Bias and Credibility

Gingrich 360 - Right Bias - Questionable Conservative - Republican - Libertarian - Not Credible - Fake NewsFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing of credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Gingrich 360 Far-Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


Founded in 2009, Gingrich 360 is a multimedia production company and consulting firm based in Washington, D.C. Former Speaker Newt Gingrich founded Gingrich 360. The organization specializes in producing historical and public policy documentary films, podcasts, books, and newsletters and engaging in television and radio appearances. Additionally, Gingrich 360 offers strategic planning, consulting, and training services focusing on various areas, including health, education, national security, and politics.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Gingrich 360 is primarily owned and chaired by former Speaker Newt Gingrich, and Former Ambassador Callista L. Gingrich serves as its President and Chief Executive Officer. Specific details about the funding and ownership structure beyond this leadership are not publicly disclosed on the Gingrich 360 website. However, we assume that it includes revenue from memberships, film production, podcasting, book sales, television and radio appearances, consulting services, and potentially donations or grants, based on typical revenue sources for media production companies.

Analysis / Bias

Gingrich 360, founded by Newt Gingrich, encompasses a range of multimedia content, including articles reflecting Gingrich’s political and historical perspectives. This analysis assesses the platform’s content, particularly its articles, for bias and credibility.

Newt Gingrich’s background as a politician and “historian” (He has faced criticism for his political and partisan approach to history and for using the title “historian” in a political context, which some historians and fact-checkers have disputed.) significantly influences the content of Gingrich 360. His varied stance on scientific issues, especially climate change, and strong affiliation with the Republican Party and former President Donald Trump are reflected in the site’s tone and perspective. Articles such as “The Left Will Never Stop Attacking Trump” demonstrate a clear right-wing bias, portraying Trump’s indictment as a result of political animosity rather than legal grounds.

Gingrich’s writing style, marked by emotive language and an us-versus-them narrative, caters to Trump’s supporters, often depicting them as targets of a biased establishment. This approach indicates conservative, pro-Trump opinion journalism, prioritizing political interpretation over impartial analysis.

Adding to this analysis is the article “The Delaware Sopranos Put America’s Survival at Risk,” which criticizes the Biden administration and suggests a corrupt family dynamic akin to a criminal organization. (TV show Sopranos) This article further exemplifies the site’s right-leaning bias and preference for politically charged narratives over objective reporting.

Finally, the website also promotes baseless conspiracy theories like the debunked Seth Rich conspiracy theory in 2017 and the 2020 election being stolen from Donald Trump: What Can We Do To Stop the Steal? This article has been removed from the website but still exists in the archive. In general, Gingrich 360 holds far-right biases and is not always factual.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Gingrich 360 Far-Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and failed fact checks. (M. Huitsing 11/24/2023)


Last Updated on November 24, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: