Last updated on February 4th, 2020 at 02:24 pm
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Experience Awareness a Questionable Source based on being an imposter website, promoting propaganda, conspiracies, pseudoscience, use of poor sources who have failed fact checks, a complete lack of transparency and blatant plagiarism.
Reasoning: Imposter site, Fake News, Conspiracy, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Lack of Transparency, Plagiarism
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
Experience Awareness is an imposter website, meaning it uses a deceptive domain or looks like a credible news website, but it is not. The use of the domain AbcBusinessNews.com that leads to a Questionable website called Experience Awareness is a classic example of an Imposter website.
Experience Awareness curates news from a variety of mostly extreme right Questionable and/or conspiracy websites. Further, this source completely lacks transparency as there is not a means to contact them, there isn’t any original content, and ownership is not disclosed. The only name associated with the website is fake: Cornelius Rupert T.
Funded by / Ownership
The website does not disclose ownership and there does not appear to be a revenue source.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Experience Awareness curates news from six different sources as follows: CNN (Left), Zerohedge (Right-Conspiracy), Drudge (Right-Questionable), Breitbart (Right-Questionable), NewsWars (Right-Questionable) and Infowars (Right-Conspiracy). CNN does seem out of place, perhaps it is an attempt to create balance?
Curated news stories are literally copied directly from the above sources in what can only be described as gross copyright infringement and plagiarism. Based on the sources used, story selection favors the right 80% of the time. Further, most of the sources have horrible track records with fact checkers, such as Alex Jones’ NewsWars and Infowars. In general, Experience Awareness is not a credible media source.
Overall, we rate Experience Awareness a Questionable Source based on being an imposter website, promoting propaganda, conspiracies, pseudoscience, use of poor sources who have failed fact checks, a complete lack of transparency and blatant plagiarism. (D. Van Zandt 9/23/2019)