A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Daily Political Newswire Right biased and Questionable, based on a complete lack of transparency, poor sourcing and promotion of propaganda.
Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Poor Sourcing, Propaganda
Founded in 2016, Daily Political Newswire is a news and opinion website that lacks an about page, owner name and author names. There is zero transparency found on this website.
Funded by / Ownership
As stated above, Daily Political Newswire does not disclose ownership. The website generates revenue through online advertising.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Daily Political Newswire publishes short news articles without hyperlinked sourcing. Most often, stories are linked to Twitter posts or through the use of quotes from other sources such as the Washington Free Beacon and Louder with Crowder, who has a poor track record with fact checkers. Headlines typically utilize loaded emotional language that either favors the right or denigrates the left, such as this: Nancy Pelosi Says Illegals Will ‘Tunnel’ Under the Wall, Dan Crenshaw Humiliates Her. Wording within articles uses even more extreme loaded language such as this quote about Nancy Pelosi: “We definitely appreciate Dan Crenshaw trying. If for no other reason that exposes her stupidity further.”
In general, there is zero balance on this website with all stories favoring the right.
Overall, we rate Daily Political Newswire Right biased and Questionable, based on a complete lack of transparency, poor sourcing and promotion of propaganda. (D. Van Zandt 1/25/2019)