Dagelijkse Standaard is rated Right with Mixed factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate the Dagelijkse Standaard (DDS) as Right Biased due to its strong ideological framing, nationalist stance, and partisan coverage of Dutch and U.S. politics. We rate its reporting as Mixed for factuality, as it reports real events but often relies on opinion-based narratives, circular referencing, and partisan or questionable sources.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.8)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.0)
Country: Netherlands
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Founded by Joshua Livestro in 2009, The Dagelijkse Standaard (DDS) is a Dutch news and opinion platform. The website was founded by Joshua Livestro and has maintained a clear right-wing liberal signature since its inception. In 2014, Michael van der Galiën became the editor-in-chief and later assumed ownership in 2016.
Read our profile on the Netherlands government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
Michael van der Galiën owns the website, and it generates revenue through advertisements and reader contributions.
Analysis / Bias
De Dagelijkse Standaard (DDS) is a Dutch-language news and opinion website with a self-described right-wing liberal stance. It covers Dutch politics, international affairs, economics, and culture. Its content frequently critiques leftist policies, the European Union, and mainstream media narratives, often using partisan framing and emotive language.
DDS heavily covers U.S. politics from a pro-Trump, anti-globalist perspective. The article “JD Vance vernietigt Zelensky met brute eerlijkheid“ is an example of sensationalist, ideological framing, portraying Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as an “ungrateful beggar” and framing U.S. aid as undeserved. The article relies on a social media post from Benny Johnson, a pro-Trump commentator with a history of spreading misinformation (X post), instead of citing independent sources or expert analysis. The closing statement, “He [Zelensky] will discover how quickly his house of cards collapses. High time for a lesson in humility,” reflects a clear editorial stance against continued Western support for Ukraine.
On climate policy, DDS takes a skeptical stance on climate change initiatives, regularly criticizing green policies and climate regulations (Climate section). Its coverage frames climate policies as government overreach and economically damaging rather than focusing on scientific consensus.
Regarding immigration, DDS strongly opposes asylum policies and supports restricting migration, often framing asylum seekers as a burden to Dutch society. The article “Actie nu! Wilders en Heutink willen asielzoekers naar de grens – Vind jij dit goed?” presents anti-immigration policies in a leading, approval-seeking tone, reinforcing its nationalist, populist stance on migration.
While DDS may report factual events, its consistent use of loaded language, reliance on right-wing sources, and editorial framing align it with partisan, conservative narratives rather than objective journalism.
Failed Fact Checks
- None to date
Overall, we rate the Dagelijkse Standaard (DDS) as Right Biased due to its strong ideological framing, nationalist stance, and partisan coverage of Dutch and U.S. politics. We rate its reporting as Mixed for factuality, as it reports real events but often relies on opinion-based narratives, circular referencing, and partisan or questionable sources. (M. Huitsing 02/21/2025)
Source: https://www.dagelijksestandaard.nl
Last Updated on February 21, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources