A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.
- Overall, we rate the Beijing Review Questionable and Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of poor sources and the publication of state propaganda through bias by omission.
Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, State Propaganda
World Press Freedom Rank: China 177/180
Launched in 1958, Beijing Review formerly known as the Peking Review is China’s National English weekly news magazine which is headquartered in Beijing.
According to its about page the Beijing Review provides coverage of “social, political and cultural affairs, world events, and politics” It also offers an “in-depth analysis on major regional and international events and provides consulting and information services.” Its online editions are published in Chinese, English, French, German and Japanese. Currently, Wang Gangyi is President and Editor-in-Chief of Beijing Review.
Funded by / Ownership
The Beijing Review is published by China International Publishing Group ( CIPG) which is owned by the Communist Party of China.
Revenue is partly derived from subscriptions, however, the USA and Canada subscription links do not work at the time of this analysis.
Analysis / Bias
Reporters without Borders report states “President Xi Jinping has succeeded in imposing a social model in China based on control of news and information and online surveillance of its citizens. At the same time, he has been trying to export this oppressive model by promoting a “new world media order” under China’s influence” According to their 2020 report, China ranks 177 out of 180, which equates to almost zero press freedom.
In review, most articles pertaining to the Communist Government are favorable with zero criticism of President Xi Jinping. In other words, the content you find on the website is generally factual and neutral in tone, but it is the consistent bias by omission that makes Beijing Review a factually Mixed propaganda source. For example “Xi’s Focus: Xi Jinping on Ethnic Unity” and “Xi underlines winning anti-poverty battle during Ningxia inspection”. Further, when sourcing they typically utilize the factually mixed Chinese state-run press agency Xinhua News Agency and China Daily (English-language daily newspaper owned by the Publicity Department of the Communist Party) as well as western news sources such as Huffpost. When reporting news pertaining to the USA Beijing Review utilizes emotionally loaded words in their articles and they do present a negative tone towards the Trump administration “Trump administration politicizes pandemic for electoral gain”. In general, the news is reported factually, however it is misleading due to strong censorship of anything that is negative toward China.
Failed Fact Checks
- They have not been fact-checked by an IFCN fact-checker.
Overall, we rate the Beijing Review Questionable and Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of poor sources and the publication of state propaganda through bias by omission. ( 8/16/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 6/11/2020)