Alliance for Securing Democracy

Last updated on February 16th, 2020 at 03:25 pm

Alliance for Securing Democracy - Least Biased - Right Leaning - CredibleFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

Notes: The Alliance for Securing Democracy is a transatlantic project that states its mission as countering what it describes as an “unprecedented attack” on United States democracy by Russia. The alliance is chaired and run primarily by former senior United States intelligence officials. The initiative is funded by The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF), in the United States and Europe. In reviewing the blog portion of this website I found well sourced information that stuck to the topic of Russia’s misinformation campaigns in elections. All information was well sourced to mostly mainstream credible news sources that ranged from Left-Center to Right-Center in bias. The Alliance for Securing Democracy has also developed a tool called Hamilton 68 that tracks Russian propaganda on Twitter. We cannot verify the accuracy of this tool, but the information is interesting and delivered without comment. The Alliance for Securing Democracy has also been criticized by The Intercept for presenting a right leaning hawkish view point. Overall, we rate the Alliance for Securing Democracy as slightly right leaning least biased and factual in reporting. (D. Van Zandt 8/6/2017)


Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

NFN-Low Biased Factual News