PRO-SCIENCE
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
- Overall, we rate The US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) as a pro-science source based on unbiased data-driven research that is highly factual and evidence-based.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
The US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) was created in 1990 under the US Global Change Research Act and is located in Washington, DC. The USGCRP brings together and oversees federal research on how the Earth’s environment changes and how these changes affect people. Formerly called the Climate Change Science Program, USGCRP coordinates and shapes research for public health, safety, economic competitiveness, and environmental sustainability issues.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
USGCRP is a federal program coordinating research on global environmental changes and their societal impacts. It is funded by 14 federal agencies and has a budget of $5.139 billion for Fiscal Year 2023.
Analysis / Bias
USGCRP’s mission is to empower the nation and the world to respond to climate and global change risks by creating accessible, usable knowledge. It emphasizes a science-driven approach to meet global change challenges.
The program’s vision is for a nation guided by science to confront climate and global change for the benefit of all. For example, an article titled “The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment” presents a comprehensive scientific assessment of how climate change is a significant threat to the health of the American people. The assessment integrates extensive scientific data and literature reviews, demonstrating a strong pro-science perspective. USGCRP’s use of well-known and trusted sources like the National Climate Assessment and EPA reports shows they are thorough and accurate in their research on climate change.
USGCRP has also faced criticism for its reactive approach to climate change education and workforce development. Critics like Christina Kwauk and Joseph W. Kane from Brookings note that USGCRP tends to respond to immediate needs rather than proactively developing comprehensive educational programs, especially K-12 education. They also highlight the significant absence of the Department of Education and the Department of Labor from USGCRP’s framework, arguing that this omission hinders the development of an effective green learning agenda.
Despite criticism of its educational programs, USGCRP is highly credible and factual in its climate change research due to its strong scientific foundation and data-driven approach. While a federal government entity, its work is based on scientific evidence and data, without a clear bias in research output. Its goals and methodologies are driven by scientific inquiry and factual evidence, not political positions, despite the politicization of climate change.
Failed Fact Checks
Overall, we rate The US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) as a pro-science source based on unbiased data-driven research that is highly factual and evidence-based. (M. Huitsing 11/26/2023)
Source: https://www.globalchange.gov/
Last Updated on November 26, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources