LEAST BIASED
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.
- Overall, we rate Upstract as Least Biased because it functions as a neutral news aggregator without original editorial content. We rate its factual reporting as Mostly Factual due to its heavy reliance on high-credibility mainstream outlets, though inclusion of a small number of lower-rated sources slightly reduces overall reliability.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-1.8)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.0)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Upstract is a long-running news aggregation website created by Thomas Marban. According to its About page, Upstract is the successor to the early Web 2.0 aggregator PopUrls and is designed to present a broad range of news sources on a single page. The site promotes itself as a curated, minimalist dashboard offering access to major news outlets across categories.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Upstract is independently owned and operated by Thomas Marban. Revenue is generated through its subscription model, Upstract Pro, which offers an ad-free experience and expanded features. The platform does not produce original reporting but aggregates headlines and links to third-party sources.
Analysis / Bias
Upstract functions strictly as a news aggregator and does not publish original editorial content. It curates headlines from a wide range of outlets including The New York Times, Reuters, Associated Press, CNN, and BBC, along with a limited number of lower-rated sources such as Daily Mail and The Blaze.
Because it draws from outlets across the political spectrum, ideological balance depends on the mix of aggregated sources rather than original editorial stance. The platform itself does not insert commentary or opinion framing into the aggregated headlines.
While most sources are high credibility, the inclusion of a few outlets with documented failed fact checks slightly lowers overall factual reliability.
Failed Fact Checks
- Upstract has not been directly fact-checked, as it does not produce original journalism. However, some aggregated sources, such as The Blaze and Daily Mail, have documented failed fact checks from IFCN-approved fact-checkers.
Overall, we rate Upstract as Least Biased because it functions as a neutral news aggregator without original editorial content. We rate its factual reporting as Mostly Factual due to its heavy reliance on high-credibility mainstream outlets, though inclusion of a small number of lower-rated sources slightly reduces overall reliability. (D. Van Zandt 03/03/2026)
Source: https://upstract.com/
Last Updated on March 3, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources