A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, overt propaganda, poor or no sourcing to credible information and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the notes section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
Red State Journalist
*Voting Polls do not affect MBFC bias ratings
Bias: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Fake News
Notes: Red State Journalist has an about page, but does not list who is maintaining the website. They state their mission as: “The idea behind RED STATE JOURNALIST is to be a centralized portal that brings the news on the US President decisions on a daily basis.” Their contact page appears to be a broken link at this time. They publish news stories under the following categories: Uncategorized, USA POLITICS, NEWS, and CRIME. Red State Journalist also has a FAQ section that mentions questions that are unrelated to a news website:
What’s your return policy?
Return any of our products–no questions asked–within 30 days of purchase. We even pay return shipping. (They don’t sell products)
Do you have customer service?
Of course! Our friendly and knowledgeable customer services reps are available to answer your questions 24/7/365. (They don’t have that either)
Red State Journalist reports with extreme right wing bias as they use heavily loaded headlines such as: “JAIL TIME: Comey Got Awful News After He Lied To Congress! It Really Is Happening!” Further, they source poorly to sources such as Zero Hedge, which promotes conspiracies, or they do not provide links at all. For example : “THIS IS SICK: Susan Rice Just Admitted What She Did To Trump’s Campaign During The Election!” Overall, we rate Red State Journalist as a Questionable Source, based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of propaganda, poor sourcing and an entirely fake FAQ section on their website. (M. Huitsing 9/14/2017)