LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Project 2025 Observer as Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them as High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and the presentation of evidence to back its claims.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.5)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Project 2025 Observer is an independent platform dedicated to tracking and analyzing the implementation of Project 2025, a policy agenda organized by The Heritage Foundation. The initiative began as a collaborative effort between two Reddit users, /u/rusticgorilla and /u/mollynaquafina, who transformed a simple spreadsheet into a comprehensive website to enhance public understanding of the Trump administration’s actions.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The platform operates independently, relying on community support to maintain its operations. Funding is primarily sourced through individual contributions via platforms like Buy Me a Coffee and Patreon.
Analysis / Bias
Project 2025 Observer examines various federal agencies’ actions under the Project 2025 agenda. It shows a progress bar indicating how much Project 2025 has been implemented. The site claims that 50% of the agenda has been enacted as of this date. For instance, the platform provides insights into changes within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), highlighting policy shifts and administrative modifications. Similarly, it analyzes developments in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), focusing on regulatory adjustments and enforcement priorities. In each case, it highlights the information within the Project 2025 document, and then a supporting link shows where it has been implemented. A review of these sources indicates they rely on credible outlets like StatNews and NPR.
The platform also features a timeline visualization, presenting a chronological overview of significant policy actions and milestones associated with Project 2025. This tool aids users in understanding the sequence and context of various administrative decisions.
While Project 2025 Observer strives for transparency and detailed analysis, it’s important to note that the platform’s content may reflect a left-leaning perspective. For example, in the article by RusticGorilla “Trump’s Control of Project 2025,” they critically examine President Trump’s influence over the project, using language that suggests a skeptical view of his intentions and actions. This critique aligns with a progressive viewpoint, indicating a left-leaning bias in its analysis.
In general, this is a valuable source for tracking the progress of Project 2025’s implementation by the Trump Administration.
Failed Fact Checks
- As an emerging platform, there are no documented failed fact checks specifically attributed to Project 2025 Observer.
Overall, we rate Project 2025 Observer as Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them as High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and the presentation of evidence to back its claims. (D. Van Zandt 02/27/2025)
Source: https://www.project2025.observer/
Last Updated on February 27, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources