Progressive Army – Bias and Credibility

Progressive Army - Left Bias - Liberal - Democrat - CredibleFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

Updated: This source is no longer online.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

The Progressive Army, according to their about page, is a publication which “provides an uncensored and unfiltered platform to progressive citizen journalists and elevates the voices of the poor, people of color, and marginalized communities”. The Progressive Army was founded in 2015 and its Editor in Chief is Benjamin Dixon.

In review, The Progressive Army, through story selection favors the left and is anti-right. There is a moderate use of loaded emotional language in their headlines and articles such as “Editorial: Keep Calm and Blame Russia: A Terrible Strategy.” The Progressive Army always sources their information to credible sources such as, The Guardian, and the Washington Post to name a few. We could not find instances where they have failed fact-checking. Overall, we rate The Progressive Army Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions and High for factual reporting. (M. Huitsing 10/12/2017)


Last Updated on June 30, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: