Pensions & Investments (P&I) - Bias and Credibility

LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate Pensions & Investments as least biased, given its commitment to presenting diverse economic perspectives without overt ideological slant. We also rate them as mostly factual in reporting rather than high due to occasional lapses in sourcing practices, which may lead to inaccuracies or incomplete information.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: United States
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Pensions & Investments is a news source for institutional investors, investment consultants, and money managers. Founded in 1973, it covers global investments, legislative reports, corporate governance, executive changes, technology, product development, and investment performance. It is published by Crain Communications and is based in New York. Led by Nikki Pirrello, Pensions & Investments also offers a print edition.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Pensions & Investment (P&I) is owned by Crain Communications Inc., owned by the Crain family. Crain Communications is a major media conglomerate known for industry-leading publications. The platform generates revenue through subscriptions, advertising, and sponsored content.

Analysis / Bias

Pensions & Investments includes sponsored content labeled as such, which may have conflicts of interest. Sponsored content is typically paid for by the featured institutions, which could influence the perspective presented.

We’ve examined some economy-related articles to provide concrete examples of potential bias and factual accuracy within Pensions & Investments’ reporting. In reviewing the article titled “Biden Budget Aims to Bolster Social Security, Raise Taxes on stock buybacks, corporations,” it’s evident that President Biden’s proposals and opposing viewpoints are fairly represented. The author quoted President Biden stating that he opposes any Social Security or Medicare cuts and will prevent any efforts to raise the retirement age. Additionally, the article includes perspectives from former President Trump and House Republicans, providing a balanced representation of differing viewpoints. However, while the article presents direct quotes from both sides, it could benefit from a deeper analysis of the arguments presented and their implications. Despite this, the article’s framing appears balanced, allowing readers to consider multiple perspectives. Regarding the sourcing, the author references information from social media platforms and official statements from the White House.

The article “Canadian Pension Funds Ramping Up Private Credit Amid High Inflation, high-interest rates” explores the trend of Canadian pension funds increasingly investing in private credit to seek higher returns and diversify their portfolios. It details how pension funds like Alberta Investment Management Corp. (AIMCo) are expanding their presence in the private credit space, citing opening a new office in New York as part of AIMCo’s strategy. The piece includes perspectives from industry experts and pension fund executives, highlighting the reasons behind the growing interest in private credit, such as attractive risk-adjusted returns and portfolio diversification benefits. Additionally, it touches upon illiquidity concerns, offering a comprehensive overview of the topic.

The article relies on circular sourcing, internal sources, or expert quotes without providing external links or verifiable references, thus exhibiting weak sourcing practices.

In general, Pensions & Investments exhibits minimal bias by providing balanced perspectives; however, poor sourcing techniques or a complete lack of hyperlinked sourcing renders them mostly factual in reporting.

Failed Fact Checks

None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Pensions & Investments as least biased, given its commitment to presenting diverse economic perspectives without overt ideological slant. We also rate them as mostly factual in reporting rather than high due to occasional lapses in sourcing practices, which may lead to inaccuracies or incomplete information. (M. Huitsing 03/14/2024)

Source: https://www.pionline.com/

Last Updated on March 21, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check