RIGHT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate the Institute for Justice as Right-Center biased based on its consistent advocacy for libertarian principles. The organization earns a High factual rating for its well-documented legal work, transparent funding, and consistent sourcing.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.8)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.6)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
The Institute for Justice (IJ) is a nonprofit public interest law firm founded in 1991. According to its About Us page, IJ defends individual rights, particularly economic liberty, private property, free speech, and school choice. The organization operates nationwide and frequently takes on high-profile constitutional cases to limit government overreach. A Board of Directors governs IJ and publishes its financial reports to maintain transparency. Additional background is available on InfluenceWatch. They are based in Arlington, Virginia.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
IJ is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization funded by individual donors, philanthropic foundations, and grant-making institutions. It does not accept government funding. Detailed information on finances and fundraising can be found in its public financial reports, which show consistent support from libertarian-leaning foundations and individual contributions.
Analysis / Bias
The Institute for Justice strongly reflects a libertarian legal philosophy, advocating for limited government and expansive individual rights. Its core issues, outlined on the Issues page, include fighting civil forfeiture, challenging excessive occupational licensing, and defending small businesses from regulatory overreach.
Their case history supports this orientation. For instance, in Ligon v. City of Tyler, IJ defended homeowners facing forced demolition of private property without due process, showcasing their defense of private property rights against local government abuse.
IJ also challenges educational restrictions and supports school choice, consistent with libertarian support for alternatives to public schooling. In the Atlanta vending case, IJ fought against city-imposed vending monopolies, advocating for entrepreneurs’ right to earn a living.
Although IJ claims to be nonpartisan, it occasionally publishes commentary critical of progressive policies. In “Public Use, Ballot Selfies, and a Bonkers Closing Statement”, the author takes a skeptical tone toward DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) programs, suggesting that such initiatives may prioritize racial classification over individual rights. While not overtly political, this article reflects a libertarian critique of collectivist policies.
IJ’s writing is well-organized, legally grounded, and properly sourced.
Failed Fact Checks
Overall, we rate the Institute for Justice as Right-Center biased based on its consistent advocacy for libertarian principles. The organization earns a High factual rating for its well-documented legal work, transparent funding, and consistent sourcing. (D. Van Zandt 04/05/2025)
Source: https://ij.org/
Last Updated on April 5, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources