These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

• Overall, we rate Inside Philanthropy Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Inside Philanthropy was founded in 2014 by David Callahan in Los Angeles, California. Callahan also co-founded Demos, a national think tank, and Blue Tent. The Organization states its mission as “To pull back the curtain on one of the most powerful and dynamic forces shaping society” and “dig into how foundations and major donors are giving away their money, and why.” 

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Inside Philanthropy generates revenue primarily through paid memberships, with additional income from sponsored content and advertising. David Callahan is the founder and editor of Inside Philanthropy.

Analysis / Bias

Inside Philanthropy’s articles and reports demonstrate a left-center bias, particularly in their coverage of philanthropic efforts aimed at environmental sustainability and social justice; for instance, the article “Have K-12 Funders Stepped Up for Racial Equity and Justice Since 2020? Not According to This Report” demonstrates a left bias in its coverage of philanthropic efforts related to racial equity and justice in education. The article critiques the lack of progress in funding for racial equity and justice initiatives since 2020. It challenges philanthropy to do better in supporting transformative investments in racial equity and justice work.

The website’s language often aligns with progressive ideals, advocating increased transparency and accountability in philanthropic practices. An example of this bias is evident in the coverage of the Neumanns’ philanthropy. The article emphasizes the need for transparency and public accountability in disclosing donations and their impact. The article’s tone suggests a critical view of corporate philanthropy tied to high-profile individuals and companies. The website also highlights initiatives that promote equity, diversity, and inclusion within the philanthropic sector, showcasing a commitment to progressive values and social change. Regarding sourcing, the author cites sources such as The Guardian, NY Times, Reuters, Forbes, Fortune.com, and CNN, along with expert opinions, to support its claims and conclusions.

Failed Fact Checks

• None in the Last 5 years. In fact, they are frequently used as a source by IFCN fact-checkers.

Overall, we rate Inside Philanthropy Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record. (D. Van Zandt 10/15/2017) Updated (03/15/2024)

Source: https://www.insidephilanthropy.com