QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Inland NW Report as Extreme Right Biased and questionable due to its consistent publication of unsubstantiated conspiracies, far-right propaganda, and partisan disinformation. Its factual reporting is rated Very Low due to a lack of transparency, reliance on discredited sources, and regular promotion of false or misleading claims. The site fails to meet even minimal standards of responsible journalism and should be regarded as highly unreliable.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, False Claims, Lack of Transparency. Conspiracy, Pseudoscience
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.2)
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.7)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Inland NW Report is a hyperpartisan political website that publishes far-right opinion content, conspiracy theories, and unverified claims. The site provides no “About” page, no editorial staff listings, no mission statement, and no contact information. Its Facebook profile offers no verifiable identity or organizational structure, demonstrating a complete lack of transparency in ownership, funding, and editorial oversight.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The website does not disclose any ownership or funding information. There are no visible ads, donation pages, or subscription models, and no indication of who maintains the site. The absence of these details is a significant transparency failure, disqualifying it from meeting minimum standards for accountability in journalism.
Analysis / Bias
Inland NW Report exhibits an Extreme Right bias through its consistent promotion of conspiracy theories, pseudoscientific claims, and hyper-partisan attacks, particularly against Democrats and perceived “deep state” actors. In “Is Supreme Court Justice John Roberts Being Blackmailed?”, the author recycles an old conspiracy theory implying blackmail of a Supreme Court justice without presenting any credible evidence.
A 2022 article titled “INWR SPECIAL REPORT – Covid-19 PLANDEMIC (Socialists’/Globalists’ Scheme for Control), FAL$E MEDICAL REPORT$, the $$$$$, MASK FACTS and VACCINE DANGERS! – BIGGEST SCAM EVER!!!” spreads vaccine misinformation and depopulation conspiracy theories, falsely alleging a globalist plan to harm billions through COVID-19 vaccines. Similarly, in “DOJ: Investigate the Unexplained 6.3M Dem 2020 Votes”, the site promotes debunked election fraud narratives, repeating false claims that have been extensively disproven by audits, courts, and independent fact-checkers.
The editorial tone is intensely partisan and, at times, apocalyptic. In “Would Democrats, Deep State Rather Destroy America…”, the author suggests Democrats and intelligence agencies would prefer nuclear war over Donald Trump’s re-election—a claim that reflects cult-like devotion to Trump and vilifies his opponents in extreme, conspiratorial terms.
Importantly, the website’s sidebar highlights its favorite sources, all of which are far-right and rated as questionable by MBFC. These include Natural News (a known promoter of health misinformation and conspiracy theories), Independent Sentinel (a fringe right-wing site), and Judicial Watch (a politically active group with a strong partisan agenda). This list of preferred outlets reinforces Inland NW Report’s conspiratorial and extreme-right orientation.
Failed Fact Checks
- There are no official third-party fact checks directly targeting Inland NW Report. However, the site repeatedly promotes debunked claims, vaccine misinformation, and false election narratives, qualifying it as Very Low Factual under MBFC standards.
Overall, we rate Inland NW Report as Extreme Right Biased and questionable due to its consistent publication of unsubstantiated conspiracies, far-right propaganda, and partisan disinformation. Its factual reporting is rated Very Low due to a lack of transparency, reliance on discredited sources, and regular promotion of false or misleading claims. The site fails to meet even minimal standards of responsible journalism and should be regarded as highly unreliable. (D. Van Zandt 03/22/2025)
Source: https://inlandnwreport.com/
Last Updated on March 22, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

