LEAST BIASED
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.
- Overall, HELLO! Magazine is rated as least biased due to its primary focus on entertainment and celebrity news. However, factual accuracy is rated as mixed due to poor sourcing and the promotion of pseudoscience in some sections.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Founded in Spain in 1944 by Antonio Sánchez Gómez and Mercedes Junco Calderón, HELLO! Magazine is a British weekly specializing in celebrity news, royalty coverage, entertainment, and lifestyle content. It was launched in the U.K. in 1988 and has since expanded to various international editions, including the U.S. and Canadian editions. As part of the Hola S.A. group, the Magazine has significant operations in the U.K. and U.S.
Read our profile on U.K. government influence on media.
Funded by / Ownership
HELLO! Magazine is owned by the Spanish publishing company HOLA Group. The Magazine’s revenue comes from magazine sales, advertising, and syndication of its content across various media platforms.
Analysis / Bias
HELLO! Magazine extensively covers celebrity and royal news, focusing on lifestyle and entertainment content. The accuracy of the information varies depending on the source and verification methods for celebrity news. The Magazine’s editorial choices often lean towards visually-driven content and emotionally engaging stories.
The article titled: “Bikini-clad Pippa Middleton Looks Stronger Than Ever on Luxurious Caribbean Holiday” emphasizes visual content, showcasing Pippa Middleton’s appearance and lifestyle with many photos. It employs sensationalized language to highlight her physical appearance and the holiday’s luxury, relying more on public images than verifiable information, which is typical for entertainment-focused content.
The second article, “Clear brain fog with this totally free menopause hack you probably haven’t thought of,” provides basic hydration advice as a menopause strategy from “expert” Simone Thomas without detailing her qualifications. It simplifies menopause management and promotes her supplement-selling business website. The article ends with a direct invitation to visit Simone Thomas’s supplement range by stating, “Visit SimoneThomasWellness.com to view her range of supplements,” indicating potential commercial affiliations. However, it lacks clear labeling for promotional content, which could mislead readers. Lastly, The horoscope section on the website promotes astrology, a pseudoscience unsupported by scientific evidence.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, HELLO! Magazine is rated as least biased due to its primary focus on entertainment and celebrity news. However, factual accuracy is rated as mixed due to poor sourcing and the promotion of pseudoscience in some sections. (M. Huitsing 02/22/2024)
Source: hellomagazine.com
Last Updated on February 22, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources