Health Helpline – Bias and Credibility

Health Helpline - Pseudoscience - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation are recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Health Helpline as a right-leaning pseudoscience website based on the promotion of medical information and claims that do not align with the consensus of science, especially as it relates to COVID-19 and its vaccines.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: New Zealand
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: EXCELLENT
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

The Health Helpline, associated with NZDSOS, offers health advice and services. It focuses on alternative treatments and addresses what it terms: “vaccine injuries.” The site publishes articles on various health topics, often emphasizing skepticism toward mainstream medical practices.

Read our profile on New Zealand’s media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

The organization’s website lacks detailed financial transparency. It generates revenue through donations and booking health consultation appointments. It also runs a vaccine Injury Fund to support patients financially.

Analysis / Bias

The Health Helpline exhibits a right-leaning bias, primarily promoting alternative treatments and critiquing conventional medicine.

The article “Blood Test Interpretation” questions mainstream medical interpretations of blood tests, suggesting that many “normal” results may be misleading or incorrect. Another article, “Vitamin D,” discusses vitamin D benefits. Health Helpline cites sources like the Brownstone Institute and Jon Kabat-Zinn’s website. The Brownstone Institute is known for its skepticism toward mainstream medical practices and COVID-19 measures. Jon Kabat-Zinn’s site promotes mindfulness and meditation practices, which are less controversial but do not directly support or validate medical claims. This mixture of sources contributes to the questionable reliability of Health Helpline’s information.



Health Helpline is right-leaning due to its consistent promotion of alternative treatments and skepticism towards conventional medicine. Additionally, the site directs users to services for treating “vaccine injuries,” which aligns with its controversial stance on COVID-19 vaccines. Finally, its affiliation with a known conspiracy-pseudoscience source like NZDSOS further reduces its credibility.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None by a third-party fact checker.

Overall, we rate Health Helpline as a right-leaning pseudoscience website based on the promotion of medical information and claims that do not align with the consensus of science, especially as it relates to COVID-19 and its vaccines. (M. Huitsing 06/13/2024)

Source: https://health-helpline.co.nz/

Last Updated on June 13, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: