Family Survival Headlines – Bias and Credibility

Family Survival Headlines - Right Bias - Questionable - Conservative - Not Credible or ReliableFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Family Survival Headlines Right Biased and Questionable based on the use of poor sources and a complete lack of transparency.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, Pseudoscience
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

In the past, Family Survival Headlines was a strong conspiracy and pseudoscience website. It appears since our last review, they mostly aggregate right-leaning news. The website lacks transparency as it does not have an about page, name authors, or owners.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Family Survival Headlines does not disclose ownership, and revenue is derived through advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Family Survival Headlines publishes news and opinion videos from other sources with a right-leaning bias. Headlines often contain loaded emotional language such as this CNN proves the left can blame ‘climate change’ for ANYTHING. Some of the sources used are the Questionable Fox News, The Blaze, and Dan Bongino.

During the 2020 Election, they promoted election fraud misinformation. In general, many news stories are factual and from reliable sources; however, some are from poor sources that have failed fact checks. They also promote pseudoscience, such as this Drinking This Juice Daily Can Rid Your Skin of Pimples and Blemishes. There is little evidence to support this claim.



Failed Fact Checks

  • They have never been fact-checked.

Overall, we rate Family Survival Headlines Right Biased and Questionable based on the use of poor sources and a complete lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt 2/15/2017) Updated (10/20/2022)

Source: http://familysurvivalheadlines.com/

Last Updated on May 24, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: