Eurasia Review – Bias and Credibility

Eurasia Review - Least Biased - CredibleFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

  • Overall, we rate Eurasia Review Least Biased since they typically publish stories from different right-left wing perspectives and high for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Launched in 2009, Eurasia Review is a news and analysis site on world events and politics. Eurasia Review contributors are an international community of writers, bloggers, digital activists, think tanks, and academics. Robert Steven Duncan is the general manager. Eurasia Review has a long list of contributors; although we couldn’t go through all of the contributor’s lists, we identified some contributors listed that either have no contributions, such as Business Intelligence Journal or has only 2 articles written, such as Michael Moore. Eurasia Review states its mission is to “provide a venue for analysts and experts to disseminate content on a wide range of subjects that are often overlooked or under-represented by Western-dominated media.”

Funded by / Ownership

Eurasia Review is owned by Buzz Future LLC, a public relations and consulting firm based in Albany, Oregon. Revenue is derived through donations and advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Eurasia Review utilizes credible sources such as Bloomberg, LA Times, Foreign Policy, and Huffington Post. However, some articles utilize local sources such as The North Africa Post, Civil Georgia, and more of the mentioned region or country that we have no way of verifying credibility. Further, Eurasia Review uses minimally loaded emotional language in their headlines and articles, such as “Foreign Ministers Agree New Areas Of NATO-EU Cooperation and they sometimes use large blocks of quotations without providing links to their sources.

Eurasia Review publishes analysis from the right-leaning Mises Institute, which is a libertarian think tank described by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as a “major center promoting libertarian political theory and the Austrian School of free-market economics, pioneered by the late economist Ludwig von Mises.” They also publish articles from the left-leaning Popular ResistanceMargaret Flowers, who is a healthcare reform activist and co-founder of Popular Resistance; and Kevin Zeese. Kevin Zeese ran for the US Senate, where both Greens and Libertarians nominated Zeese for Maryland Senate in 2006. In general, story selection is balanced and factual.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Eurasia Review Least Biased since they typically publish stories from different right-left wing perspectives and high for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record. (M. Huitsing 12/06/2017) Updated (10/03/2022)



Source: https://www.eurasiareview.com/

Last Updated on May 24, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: